The title alone was enough to make me ask: Who paid for this?
Conclusion: This study provides factual information about the animal protein contribution to total proteins compatible with meeting all nutrient-based recommendations at no additional cost and shows that it varies between 45% and 60% depending on the group of adults considered.
Comment: The meat industry has a problem. High meat consumption has been associated with poor health; meat production has been associated with climate change. This study is designed to push back on the first association.
For data on whether and how industry funding influences the design and outcome of research, please see my book, Unsavory Truth: How Food Companies Skew the Science of What We Eat.
The post Industry funded study of the week: Meat! appeared first on Food Politics by Marion Nestle.